The case centers around accusations that Henrique deliberately received a yellow card during the match against Santos on November 1, 2023, actions allegedly taken to influence sports betting outcomes.

In a recent development, Flamengo requested that the Court consider the statute of limitations in the potential match-fixing case against Henrique. The 1st Disciplinary Commission of the Superior Court of Sports Justice (STJD) responded by majority vote, deciding to reject the request. The commission upheld the validity of the complaint filed by the Court’s Prosecutor’s Office.

On August 1, 2025, the STJD Prosecutor’s Office formally charged Bruno Henrique along with four other individuals for involvement in match-fixing connected to sports betting. Should Henrique be convicted, he could face penalties including up to two years of suspension, a 24-match ban, and fines reaching BR200,000.

Read Also: Underdog Partners with Crypto.com to Launch U.S. Sports Prediction Market

Adding a broader dimension to the case, a third-division football club from Campana, Argentina, was officially accused of attempting to manipulate a match on August 6, 2025.

The other accused individuals include amateur athletes Wander Nunes Pinto Júnior, Claudinei Vitor Mosquete Bassan, Andryl Sales Nascimento dos Reis, and Douglas Ribeiro Pina Barcelos.

Before ruling on the case’s substantive issues, the 1st Disciplinary Commission evaluated preliminary procedural matters, including the applicability of the statute of limitations. The panel’s decision was to reject the preliminary motion by a vote of 4-1.

Following a disciplinary hearing held on September 4, 2025, Henrique was sanctioned with a 12-match suspension and a BR$60,000 fine by the STJD. The decision was based on Articles 243 and 243-A of the Brazilian Code of Sports Justice, which address fraudulent conduct aimed at influencing match results.

The post Bruno Henrique Suspended for 12 Matches in Brazil appeared first on iGaming Amerika.

The investigation was prompted by evidence provided by the Federal Police, and the STJD is currently finalizing its report to determine whether to officially file charges or close the case. Notably, no preventive suspension has been requested, allowing Bruno Henrique to continue participating in matches while the investigation proceeds.

Key evidence in the case includes messages uncovered on phones seized by the Federal Police. Among these, a conversation reveals that Bruno Henrique’s brother, Wander Nunes Pinto Júnior, asked when the player would receive his third yellow card, to which Bruno Henrique responded, “Against Santos.” This exchange has raised suspicions of manipulation under Article 200 of the General Sports Law, which addresses the manipulation of sports results, carrying a potential sentence of two to six years, as well as allegations of fraud, which can result in a prison sentence of one to five years.

The investigation also identifies additional individuals involved in the alleged scheme. These include Wander Nunes Pinto Júnior, Bruno Henrique’s brother; Ludymilla Araújo Lima, who is married to Wander; and Poliana Ester Nunes Cardoso, Bruno Henrique’s cousin—all of whom are suspected of being connected to betting activities. Furthermore, a second group of bettors, comprising Claudinei Vitor Mosquete Bassan, Rafaela Cristina Elias Bassan, Henrique Mosquete do Nascimento, Andryl Sales Nascimento dos Reis, Max Evangelista Amorim, and Douglas Ribeiro Pina Barcelos, is linked to Wander and suspected of participating in the betting scheme. The Federal Police’s indictment issued in April may lead to formal charges in the Common Court, pending the decision of the Public Ministry of the Federal District.

Read also: Brazil and IBIA Join Forces to Safeguard Sports Betting Integrity

Bruno Henrique’s legal team has responded to the allegations by filing a request on May 20 at the 7th Criminal Court of the Federal District, seeking to dismiss the investigation. They argue that the player’s actions do not constitute fraud or result in match manipulation. The defense references findings from the Senate’s Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, emphasizing that “It is necessary to highlight that the criminal type of article 200 of the General Sports Law does not apply to the hypothetical situation of an athlete who deliberately receives a yellow card due to a sports strategy.” The Public Prosecutor’s Office is currently reviewing this request as the case continues to develop. Flamengo’s Bruno Henrique Betting

The post STJD to Hold Private Hearing in Flamengo’s Bruno Henrique Betting Scandal appeared first on iGaming Amerika.